C-level financial
Executive Financial Dashboard
- For
- CEO, CFO, board
- Asks
- Is the business growing profitably, and is technology spend earning its place in the P&L?
- Period
- Rolling 12 months, Sep 2025 – Aug 2026
Dashboards
Four worked examples, built by me to demonstrate business acumen: what I measure, who I measure it for, and what I conclude from the reading. All four run on synthetic data and each states the period it covers. The numbers are invented; the judgment is the point.
Example dashboard — demo data.Synthetic figures built to illustrate the instrumentation. No employer data.
These four boards are worked examples by Alvaro Garcia, built to demonstrate business acumen: what to measure, who to measure it for, and what to conclude from the reading. The numbers are invented; the judgment is the point.
C-level financial
ITIL v4
Portfolio & dependencies
How to read these
Every board names who it is for. A board that speaks to a CFO and a board that speaks to a VP Engineering should not contain the same numbers, and these do not.
Each dashboard exists to answer one business question. If you cannot connect a metric back to that question, the metric is decoration and should be cut.
Green, amber and red mean healthy, watch and breach — nothing else on the site uses them. The teal accent never signals status, so a colored number always means something.
Units are printed above each chart, and every chart has a data table underneath it. A chart you cannot check is a chart you have to take on trust.
Each board closes with what I would actually say in the room — what the pattern means, what it does not mean, and what I would do. Instrumentation is the easy half.
What each one covers
That I report technology in the language a board already uses — margin, EBITDA, variance and unit economics — instead of asking them to learn mine.
That I run service operations against an ITIL v4 framework where every commitment has a number, an owner and an aging clock.
That I read DORA metrics against their published performance bands rather than just plotting them — throughput and stability are one trade-off, not two scores.
This is the one that shows judgment rather than instrumentation: sequencing, dependencies, RAG status and the investment-to-benefit case behind each lane.